Política · The Conversation
How Trump’s crypto winnings undermined the industry’s push for looser regulation
Medio: The Conversation · theconversation.com · País del medio: Internacional
EXTRACTO DEL FEED · ATRIBUIDO AL MEDIO
The crypto industry tried to seize the chance to legislate massive deregulation once President Donald Trump started his second term. AP Photo/Mark Humphrey
The crypto industry has just suffered a paradoxical defeat: Its biggest backer, President Donald Trump, inadvertently helped scuttle chances for a major legislative win thanks to revelations of the riches he and his family have made off of their crypto ventures.
The industry is now scrambling to advance its agenda through crypto-friendly regulation instead of legislation. But the prospect of Democratic control of one or both chambers of Congress after the November 2026 midterm elections, as well as potentially winning the White House in 2028, leaves the long-term durability of those gains uncertain.
At stake was legislation that would have provided light-touch regulation over crypto assets. The industry, which had enjoyed a series of wins since Trump started his second term, had secured bipartisan support for the measure, dubbed the Clarity Act, and poured hundreds of millions into lobbying.
But the steady drip of news in the spring and summer of 2026 about the Trump family’s lucrative crypto businesses ultimately undermined those efforts. Democratic support in the Senate faltered, and after several attempts at a compromise, the bill died on a procedural vote on Sept. 15, 2026, falling short of the required 60-vote majority.
As a scholar of financial regulation, I believe the growing backlash against Trump’s conflicts of interest surrounding his crypto wealth changed the political calculus. The Senate Democrats who had initially supported the measure increasingly feared they would be seen as voting to further enrich Trump. While the final bill contained some ethics provisions, they didn’t suffice to keep those Democrats on board.
This outcome leaves the industry in limbo and unsure of how to spend its considerable campaign war chest ahead of the midterms. If it decides to invest heavily to defeat crypto-skeptical Democrats, I believe it could risk a backlash should Democrats retake the House, the Senate, or both.
Under that scenario, Democrats could launch congressional investigations or introduce legislation to impose stringent oversight over the industry. Furthermore, if voters see the industry as overly partisan, that perception could further erode trust in a sector that has desperately tried to repair its image since the collapse of crypto exchange FTX in 2022.
Crypto interests seize an opening
The Clarity Act was designed to answer a long-standing question: Should crypto assets be regulated as securities, like stocks, or commodities, like gold?
Companies that sell securities face more scrutiny, as they’re required to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission and disclose detailed information to investors. But commodity trading follows looser rules. There’s another agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, that oversees markets for commodity derivatives. But it doesn’t supervise the markets where people buy and sell commodities directly, known as “spot” markets.
Under President Joe Biden, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler took a stringent approach. He treated most crypto tokens as securities and brought dozens of enforcement cases against crypto issuers and exchanges. Many of those cases involved charges of fraud or unregistered offering of securities.
The industry fought back, arguing that many tokens were decentralized, meaning that no single company controlled them. The implication, in turn, was that there was no one who could make the required disclosures to regulators.
The industry saw a major opening with the 2024 election, prompting hopes of a more crypto-friendly administration and Congress. It spent unprecedented sums – over US$119 million – to back pro-crypto candidates in both parties. Trump also sensed an opportunity, reversing earlier criticism. At one bitcoin conference, he told the crowd that he would fire Gensler “on day one” of his administration and make the United States “the crypto capital of the planet.”
But Trump’s victory didn’t end the industry’s political spending. The crypto exchange Coinbase sponsored the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary parade and joined several other crypto companies and executives in donating funds to the White House ballroom.
That lobbying blitz secured some immediate wins for the industry. In July 2025, Trump signed the GENIUS Act, establishing a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins – digital tokens designed to hold a steady value of one dollar and backed by liquid reserves like Treasury bills.
Revelations of riches
The biggest prize for the crypto industry was the prospect of legislation that would permanently impose light-touch regulation over crypto trading. That framework, in my view, would also have legalized a business model laden with conflicts of interest.
The Clarity Act was the vehicle for this push. It would have permanently placed most crypto trading under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and no longer treat most tokens as securities. This means investors in cryptocurrencies wouldn’t have had the same rights and protections that exist in securities markets.
At first, the bill’s prospects looked good. In the summer of 2025, the House of Representatives passed its version 294-134, with 78 Democrats, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, voting in favor.
The bill’s chances in the Senate, while less certain, still seemed likely at that point, with multiple Senate Democrats expressing support. But just before the Senate Banking Committee was set to vote on its draft in January 2026, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong posted on the social media platform X that his company wouldn’t support the measure.
Democrats unsuccessfully pushed for stronger ethics language in a crypto regulatory overhaul that would have applied to President Trump’s family, including son Eric Trump. Daniel Ceng/Anadolu via Getty Images
Coming from the chief of the largest U.S. crypto exchange, that opposition would have doomed the bill. That unexpected wrinkle forced a postponement of the vote, followed by more rounds of revisions.
The panel finally approved the rewrite in May, but the delay proved costly. In those intervening months, new reports shed light on the Trump family’s crypto businesses, including World Liberty Financial and its stablecoin USD1, the $TRUMP memecoin and a bitcoin mining company, among others.
Then came Trump’s own financial disclosures in June, which reported more than $1.4 billion in crypto-related…
Leer la noticia original en The Conversation ↗Países detectados en el texto: Estados Unidos · Clasificación automática.
Veracidad y contraste
Sin verificación editorialNo se asigna un porcentaje de verdad. La coincidencia entre publicaciones mide cobertura, no demuestra exactitud ni independencia.
Escala de 0 a 5 o más dominios. La agrupación usa similitud de titulares dentro de una ventana de 48 horas y puede equivocarse.
Cómo funciona el contraste →